Menu

In the News

People on SNAP are some of Big Soda’s best customers — and biggest ad targets

Food and beverage marketers aggressively target low-income communities in marketing unhealthy foods, says Pamela Mejia from PHI's Berkeley Media Studies Group in this Mic article responding to a recent report that showed  American households benefitting from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) spent more SNAP money on soda than any other item.

Have public health programs been subtly funding the soda industry? It appears so.

A November report from the United States Department of Agriculture revealed that American households benefitting from Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) spent more SNAP money on soda than any other item. People on SNAP spent an average of 9.3% of grocery spending on sweetened drinks, and people not on SNAP spent an average of 7.1% on sweetened drinks in 2011, the report noted.

On the heels of the report, a bipartisan commission recommended that Congress remove some sugary beverages from SNAP, the Initiative on Food and Ag Policy reported in January 2016.

“I didn’t think [spending on soda] would be that high,” Marion Nestle — a professor in the Department of Nutrition, Food Studies, & Public Health at NYU — said in an email, explaining that soda and sweet beverages have become a cultural norm and are often consumed instead of water.

Sugary drinks are a class issue, Nestle noted. “Income and other factors make people vulnerable” when it comes to public health, Mari Gallagher, a food equity researcher, said in a phone interview, explaining that people who are eligible for SNAP often live in places where stores don’t always have affordable, healthy drink options.

SNAP dollars are often spent on junk, and food advertisers want to keep it that way.

“Marketers use every tool they have to aggressively target low-income folks,” Pamela Mejia, a senior media researcher at Berkeley Media Studies Group, said in an email. “Research shows that food and beverage marketers aggressively target low-income communities for the purchase of unhealthy foods.”

Why focus on low-income people? The reason is a bit paradoxical: “There’s lots of money to be made,” Mejia said. “Industry insiders openly acknowledge that ‘low-income America is the third-largest nation in the world’ in terms of buying power.”

Continue reading the full article.

Originally published by Mic


More Updates

Work With Us

You change the world. We do the rest. Explore fiscal sponsorship at PHI.

Bring Your Work to PHI

Support Us

Together, we can accelerate our response to public health’s most critical issues.

Donate

Find Employment

Begin your career at the Public Health Institute.

See Jobs

Close

PHI's Top 24 Impacts for 2024

During 2024, PHI worked alongside our partners to advance public health research, policies, programs and interventions in communities around the globe. Explore some of our most impactful work in 2024—a collection of our top stories, tools, resources and ideas that helped to improve health, advance equity and build community power.

See the impacts

Continue to PHI.org